I'm trying to find out WHAT exactly
Tan Lian Hoe said to piss off Penang UMNO and the Majlis Belia so much and in the process am crystallizing one of my major frustrations about the way news is reported in Malaysia.
This is how it always happens:
1. Some politician or public figure says something at a speech in a meeting or press conference.
2. Some
other person (usually a politician, but can be some other type of VIP)
complains about #1 and demands an apology/retraction.
3. The press reports on #2.
4. #1 and his or her organization issue an
explanation/clarification/backpedaling.
5. The press reports on #4.
6.
Repeat steps #2-5
ad nauseam.
At NO POINT in this process is the actual content of #1, what the original fella REALLY SAID, reported so that the public at large can figure out what the hoo-hah is about. #2 is always assumed to be complaining on behalf of some demographic group that was insulted, but we never see an ordinary member of the public complaining about #1 until after #2 creates the big media storm about it.
The MBM claims that Tan questioned the special position of the Malays. Tan claims she merely made a historical statement and was trying to make the point that race should not be politicised. Without being able to read what Tan said in her speech, how are we to judge who is right?
By the way, this is not just a problem with the mainstream media, the
Malaysian Insider also didn't quote Tan's original speech in their stories. I believe this stems from a fundamental problem with the concept of "primary source" lacking from Malaysian education, from Standard One and up. Ciplak, salin, tiru, hafal, but we never learn how to research.
Also, I was trying to find out about this other fella from the Young Malay Graduates who also complained about her. When you Google "mahasiswa melayu", the first hit is a porn site =P
Labels: Malaysia, stupid