Thursday, October 27, 2005

Coins without faces

So, the Chicago Tribune yesterday ran an article about a report that the World Bank came out with about how the 'brain drain' phenomenon is crippling developing countries. I don't have enough time to write a rant about the wankers who break their JPA or MARA bonds and waste the hundreds of thousands of ringgit the government spent on them, or the idiots in the government who don't make the fines high enough so that people can't break their bonds. But the brain drain has been one of my minor obsessions since about sophomore year of college.

Basically the report's saying: You may want to stay in America because your home country sucks, but it's NOT GONNA STOP SUCKING until some of you pinheaded upper-middle-class brats work up the guts to go home and try to make it better. Read the report.

"Their vacant faces were like coins worn away by use, which had lost their imprint and only differed because they were made of different metals. Because they had come to regard the world as a great highway, they had lost all their sense of nationality: they no longer had a town, or a hearth; and, in consequence, they had no motherland."
-- Emile Souvestre, The World as It Shall Be [Le Monde tel qu'il sera], 1846

I pray for the courage to.

Monday, October 17, 2005

The Rules of Science Fiction

Rules 4 and 0 contributed by TSR.

Rule 4: It doesn’t have to be authentic; it just has to sound authentic (Shern Ren: “ :P ” ).

We live in a world governed by rules at various levels – the laws of physics, the principles of chemistry and biology determined by those laws, manners and taboos on the cultural level, and explicit ‘laws’ created by groups of people known as ‘governments’. Our brains are used to functioning in a structured world. Therefore, if you’re going to create a universe that breaks that structure, you have to establish yet another in order for the reader to be able to accept and imagine it. Some SF writers do try to stick as close as possible to known scientific principles, but that’s unnecessary unless you’re really hardcore geek and have lots of textbooks at hand. Even though providing some detail about the imaginary technology helps (it’s like mental special effects), you do _not_ need to be meticulously technical – how many SMS addicts know exactly how a handphone works?

An important corollary is that a story has to be self-consistent. That is, you can’t break your own rules. Writing something like “Ah Beng travelled to Alpha Centauri in 5 minutes by hyperspace bus” on page 1 and then on page 100, “Ah Beng’s journey back to Earth took him 50 years in hibernation because current technology still had not conquered the problem of going faster than light,” even if it’s convenient to the plot, will destroy the reader’s faith in the story. Bluff convincingly.

Rule 3: Virtually all SF texts (shorts, novels, movies, game storylines) are derivative in some way. That’s okay.

This came as a revelation when I was reading Umberto Eco’s “The Name of the Rose”. The narrator notes while visiting a huge library, “I had thought each book spoke of the things...that lie outside books. Now I realized that not infrequently books speak of books...” This may be especially true for science fiction for two reasons: first, it’s awfully hard to build a universe from scratch; and second, people who are drawn to write SF often do so because they enjoyed reading other SF authors’ work.

What was brilliantly original about “The Matrix” wasn’t really any of its concepts – it borrowed ideas from everybody from Buddha to Jesus to Lewis Carroll (you really can’t get more obvious than that white rabbit) to William Gibson (“Neuromancer”) – or Keanu Reeves’ kayu acting, for that matter, but the Wachowski brothers’ storytelling, cinematography, and effects. Borrow ideas, but re-mould the material into your own creation.

Rule 2: “Derivative” does NOT mean you can ciplak someone’s plot/universe/characters/concepts bulat-bulat.

Self-explanatory. This is something that many new and young writers tend to do when we’re caught up in awe at our favourite authors and just in the process of learning to create stories. Then when you’re older and wiser (like in uni) your mum will pull out some ancient bundle of foolscap or dot-matrix printout and go “Remember that story you wrote in Form One?” and you will read it and bang your head against the wall in embarrassment. (My first fantasy short ever borrowed heavily from _both_ “The Lord of the Rings” and Anne McCaffrey’s Dragonriders series. No wonder it didn’t win the contest.)

Writing fanfiction is a legitimate way of trying your hand at dialogue, plot-building, description, and so on, as long as you’re honest with yourself that it’s fanfiction. I liken fanfic-writing to the way art students practise painting techniques by copying old masters.

In the meantime, if you’re still miserable that you can’t come up with anything original, take comfort in reading Ray Bradbury’s “Any Friend of Nicholas Nickleby’s Is a Friend of Mine”.

Rule 1: Create a world, not a backdrop.

If you’re going to write a story about a forbidden affair between a beautiful girl from planet A falling in love with a handsome boy from planet B, forget about the interplanetary bit - that’s simply a remake of “Romeo and Juliet”. The nature of a science fiction story depends on its exploration of concepts. If you focus on some other element of the story to the point of neglecting to develop the ‘universe’ it’s set in properly, sorrylah. The story may function all right as whatever other type it’s supposed to be, but the SF fans will demand their money back. Remember how annoying it was to waste two hours watching “Species” thinking it was going to be as cool as “Alien” and discovering that the extraterrestrial material was just a lame disguise for a soft-porn flick? (Unless you like soft-porn – in which case I have no comment.)

CS Lewis, himself a science fiction enthusiast and author (in his earlier days it was called _scientifiction_, he was that old) has disparaging words about this sort of story:
“This seems to me tasteless. Whatever in a work of art is not used is doing harm. ...I am, then, condemning not all books which suppose a future widely different from the present, but those which do so without a good reason, which leap a thousand years to find plots and passions which they could have found at home.”
(From “On Science Fiction” which is a valuable essay for anyone interested in SF.)

Notice this is different from saying that romance, politics, war, dll. are _bad_. In fact, the human element in an SF story, as in any other story, is crucial because it’s what enables us, the readers, to associate with the characters and to feel that the world is ‘real’ (I was sooo happy when Miles Vorkosigan finally got married...). More on this later.

Rule 0: Science fiction has to be about people, not science (Shern Ren: “pwnage!”).

I’ve just read a very obscure novel which was written in France in 1849 about “The World As It Shall Be” in the year 3000 (by Emile Souvestre) and am still stunned at how much it looks like 2005. The author must have been a sharp observer of the social and political trends of his day, and wondered what would happen if they were taken to their [il]logical conclusion. A lot of SF writers wonder as much, with varying degrees of success. Others imagine a civilisation so far in the future or so distant from Earth that it has almost no connection to ours. It doesn’t matter – near or far, the heart of an SF story is the people in it, not the machines, not the aliens, not the wars, not the worlds.

The ultimate purpose of an SF story is to be what my old genetics prof would call a Gedankeneksperiment – a thought experiment. The range of topics, styles, and worldviews covered by SF is extremely broad, but all SF asks the question “What if...?” It tests the consequences of things which we may yet see in our lifetime (like cloning) or which may never exist (like superluminal travel or alien intelligence) to the human mind and to human society. If an experiment is to give results that are relevant to us, then it has to be set up in a way that makes sense. Characters and cultures, no matter how far removed from the present reality, still have to be ‘realistic’ in that the reader has to be able to believe that, in their own universe, they could exist. This is why you can’t write effectively about life a thousand years ahead, or life on other planets, without first knowing and appreciating something about life, here and now.

Sunday, October 16, 2005

Welcome Miss Mousie!

My (second) kid sister has started blogging. Her page design is SO much nicer than mine.

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Rabbits in the news again

My apartment manager is a jackass. We got a nasty letter today saying that he had been receiving complaints about the noise the bunnies were making and my housemate has to cage them immediately or "we will pursue eviction". Let me point out that:

  • we'd never received any communication from him, our upstairs neighbours, or our downstairs neighbour about this before (the neighbours didn't have a clue where it was coming from; the manager suspected mice and then when nothing was trapped, he decided it was the rabbits)
  • he knew she had rabbits when we all moved in and he didn't send her the "pet addendum" to the lease at the time
  • said pet addendum says nothing about having to cage pets
  • he hasn't done anything to ascertain that the noise is the rabbits' fault, beyond the neighbours' accounts that it's coming from her corner of the building.
  • PLUS he came into our apartment today without giving 24 hours' notice, or any bloody notice, for that matter.
My room is next to hers and I can hear the hamsters running around their squeaky exercise wheel at night, and I can hear her murmuring to the rabbits, but certainly nothing of the sort of "tapping noise at 3 a.m." that the downstairs lady described.

*rolls eyes* One thing that bugs me somewhat is that when I initially asked my housemate if she'd heard anything in the way of complaints from the landlord or the neighbours before, she said no and added "...unless you or SN (our other housemate) complained..." I find it irritating that she thought - granted, me and SN had never met her before August - that she could think we would be so malicious as to go and complain to the manager about a domestic issue without talking to her first - and go on deceptively acting as if we like the bunnies at the same time. SN and I have always been affectionate or at least benign towards them.

Now she's talking about looking for a new place and calling the gas people. I still think this manager is a paper tiger, a show-off bully, and if he acts unreasonably, we should talk to the actual landlords about it. Given her already-nervous disposition, I think having to deal with finding a new place and having to move in the middle of everything would really screw her up, so we ought to take action. SN and I would be supportive. But she's moping and desperate now. It's like living with Eeyore. (Actually, it was always like living with Eeyore, especially around exam time.)

This is a really badly written entry and breaking my rule of thumb about not writing about personal matters, but I'm really irate about all of them.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

My housemate's rabbit hates me now. She has two - a five-year-old neurotic English Spot and a three-month-old Netherland Dwarf. I like the 'bad brown bunny' better for her feistiness, but tonight she got out of her owner's bedroom after said human had gone to sleep (for the second night in a row, may I add) and was investigating my place. Now, I don't mind her presence per se, since she's cleaner than the old boy, but this is a rabbit who thinks she's a puppy - chews on everything. The week after we all moved in together, she chewed some of the plastic off my Alien action figure, which was on the floor since this was before I had furniture. Which could be a new addition to the Alien saga - Lagomorph vs. Xenomorph. Also, I'm trying to write some serious emails. So I tried to halau her.

Have you read Watership Down and loved it, but been unable to imagine creatures as fluffy and inoffensive-looking as rabbits snarling ferociously while cuffing and biting each other to the bone? Well, just try chasing an alarmed and sulky bunny out of your room in the middle of the night. You'll get the General Woundwort experience, all right.

Long ago
The yellow-hammer sang
He sang near a litter that the doe brought out to play...

That book has some of the best poetry-in-novel I've ever read. I used to recite Hyzenthlay's poem a lot after my first (and only, to date) romantic relationship broke up - on top of which it was the middle of winter, an abysmally dark season in Wisconsin.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Zainal Abidin

originally written Friday 7 October

I've been listening to Zainal Abidin's "Refleksi" album tonight; it's one of the best things I ever brought here from Malaysia. Sometimes when I hear or read something in Malay that has particular poetic impact, an English phrase flashes through my mind, and I'm not sure if it's the beginning of a translation or the ghost of a word that never existed because it's untranslatable. Anyway, I just decided to have a go at translating a couple of songs to see if I could.

I've taken some liberties with the meanings of the words, etc, and have totally destroyed the rhythm. The difficulty of rendering into another language even texts as apparently simple as pop songs has given me a great deal more respect for translators of novels, poetry, and treatises. William Weaver (the fler who did Umberto Eco's novels into English) rocks. The Italians say "traduttore, traditore" - translator, traitor - which reminds me of the time I was tutoring Remy in a Bio course and he said "traducion" and "acide amine" by mistake, which I thought was really cute...

I never paid much attention to this song before, but this evening I listened to "Ikhlas Tapi Jauh" and discovered its beautiful quality of yearning.



Bila bila kiranya diriku perlu
Hari yang murung
Terdengar nada yang riang ria
Sekali suara meyakinkan jiwa
Kaku langkah
Mengkaguminya
Kaku menerimanya

Selagi bahuku
Memikul bebannya
Selagi hayatku
Merasa siksa
Selama senyuman
Menjadi senyumku
Kubawa wajahmu
Walau diriku jauh
Jauh...
Sometimes when I need
a melancholy day
I hear those sounds of happiness
Once that voice wakes your spirit
Slow you step
In awe of it
Slowly - receive it

As long as my shoulders
bear their burden
As long a lifetime
feels this raw
As long as a smile
can be my joy
I carry your face
though I am far
So far...


The song is followed by what sounds like the musicians chatting in the studio and a male voice saying in English, "Yes! Yes, you listen!" quietly.


"Manis" is one of my favourite love-is-risky songs. I played it for a friend I dated once; unfortunately he was American and didn't understand a word. I think listening to this and then spending an evening making out with someone sweet would be fun. Any Malaysian guys out there want to take me up on that?



Manis mulut di bibir
Sangatlah merbahaya
Sama-sama yang menyindir
Selalunya

Janganlah terpedaya
Oleh kata-katanya
Lemah lembut bicara
Selalunya

Bukalah matamu percayalah kataku
Janganlah lalai dibiarkannya

Kau, kau ke hadapan
Setelah segalanya
Dikau tinggalkan
Tinggalkan yang mula
Senyum dan ketawa
Senantiasa

Kau manis semula
Setelah segalanya
Dikau lupakan
Tiada gunanya
Ia dikenang-kenangkan
Mengapa

Manis mulut di bibir
Harus manis di hati
Hinggalah ke akhir
Akhir pasti

Bukalah matamu
Percayalah kataku
Janganlah lalai dibiarkannya

Kau, kau yang di sana
Senyumlah selalu manis selalu
Tinggalkan yang mula
Senyum dan ketawa
Senantiasa
Lips sweet on the mouth
so dangerous
those teasing lips
always

Don't let his words
confuse you
speaking nice and soft
always

Open your eyes, believe me
Don't let him leave you aside

You, you always come through
after everything
you leave
the beginning behind
smiling and laughing
always

You're sweet again
after everything
Try to forget -
it's no use
Why do we
remember?

Lips sweet on the mouth
oughta be sweet to your heart
to the end
of everything

Open your eyes
believe me
Don't let him leave you aside

You, you're there again
always smiling, always sweet
leave the beginning
smiling and laughing
always


I'll write about another two from the "Refleksi" collection next time. "Hijau" is the first Zainal Abidin song I ever heard owing to its popularity on the radio in the last few years of the 20th century. Everything about it grabbed me - the strange voice-overs at the beginning, the lovely melody and beat, the lamenting lyrics in ordinary and Kelantanese Malay, the children's laughter bubbling away to the end.

"Ceritera" is going to be my new getting-out-of-bed song, replacing Pearl Jam's "Daughter". "Ceritera" always makes me want to dance around doing fake silat moves, an impulse which will be understandable once you listen to it. Bet you didn't know you could use the Scheduled Tasks tool in Windows' Control Panel as an alarm clock - that is, if you keep your computer turned on or in standby mode all the time.

Would like to get Shellabear's English translation of the Sejarah Melayu. I'm very proud of having finished the Malay version (in the Roman alphabet, obviously not the original Jawi (Arabic alphabet)) earlier this year. ^_^

Friday, October 07, 2005

Random things I've noticed:

  • If your bike is making a persistent rattling sound, the derailleurs aren't lined up properly - wiggle the gear levers around until the sound goes away. This is why I hate bikes with indexed gears, by the way.
  • If your bike is making a periodic rattling sound (i.e. every stroke of the pedals) one of your gears is crooked. It's just going to suck until you have enough cash to go to the bike repair shop.
  • If your bike is getting really hard to pedal and your foot is being squeezed to death, your shoelace is caught in the chainwheel. Stop immediately and untangle it, stupid.
  • Rabbits are stupid.
  • Self-control goes down the drain when I'm reading a Patrick O'Brian novel. Or a Lois McMaster Bujold novel. Or a Terry Pratchett novel. Et cetera.

Monday, October 03, 2005

deja vu in the worst possible way

Last night just before I got too tired to keep my eyes open, I went to the BBC website to check out the news and wondered why they were showing an old article from 2002 on the front page - or so I thought. If it happened again to Bali, it could happen again to, say...

Cold hard

Job update: according to my supervisor, the university has finally gotten around to signing the research work order for the lab tech position. Now they have to figure out whom to notify about it in Reston. That’s right, Reston, Virginia, the site of the Ebola Reston outbreak that Robin Cook parlayed magnificently into a lousy book and a blockbuster movie. Richard Preston’s “The Hot Zone” is nearly as bad and five times more sensationalistic.




One of the things that being on financial short rations does to one is to create a mental priority-sorted list of things one intends to do with money when one eventually is paid. Bookshelves have been high on mine since I moved here six weeks ago, after “repayment of roommate’s loan for last month’s rent” and “bike light so I don’t kill myself cruising downhill in the dark”. Bookshelves are important for the idea of stability. Keeping one’s books in cardboard boxes is only mildly inconvenient, but signals a transitory state; being able to replace them on shelves means residency. Plus, our living room remains a great expanse of empty carpet. (There’s also no ceiling light fixture, which is another parallel with the first chapter of the book of Genesis.)

Yesterday I went to a budgeting seminar at an EV Free Church which was using material produced by Willow Creek’s Good $ense ministry. (Willow Creek, which is in Illinois, I don’t like because it’s too incredibly huge. It’s more like a small city unto itself than a church, and I think it’s far too easy for megachurches to become insular, exclusive communities, and too intimidating for people who would prefer to investigate Christianity in a less concert-like setting. The Bible tells us to “shine like stars” – too massive a star ( a black hole. However, I won’t say that megachurches are the Antichrist either.)

One of the areas they discussed was credit cards. A video collage of short interviews with passersby in Chicago demonstrated that most Americans think “debt is expected and unavoidable.” I’m only buying groceries with my father’s card until I get paid, and am strongly annoyed that I have to depend on it in order to maintain an emergency reserve of real money in my bank account. Another Malaysian at my alma mater (let’s call her the Vampire Violinist in future posts, or VV) probably wouldn’t borrow money unless she was literally starving. Being in debt has classically been considered shameful in the East Asian Confucian ethic – being dependent on Ah Longs was for the poorest of the poor like tenant farmers and people with no self-discipline like gamblers. But it’s getting to be more acceptable – yeah, yeah, I’m blaming it on Western culture. Heck, even the US government is in hock to India and China (see Allan Sloan and Fareed Zakaria’s columns in a recent Newsweek). I read an essay a while ago wrote about what healthy shame is. Debtors are increasingly shameless and letting themselves be screwed big-time.

Supposedly credit cards encourage spending because there’s no tangible evidence that one has paid out money when one buys something with a credit card. I wonder if a cultural shift will come as younger people grow up in a world where information has increasing importance compared to that of physical matter, and they learn to think of money in terms of sheer numbers instead of physical bills and coins. I usually keep a mental running tally of what I’ve spent with my debit card and Papa’s credit.

On the other hand, given how damn materialistic modern urban culture is, the impulse to spend might well overpower the ability to count.

The advice offered in the book we bought for the seminar ($10) was good, but the font was childishly large and there was generally a lot of white space and repetition. Maybe this is to avoid intimidating participants already frightened by the complications of personal finance, but for information-hungry people like me, it’s irritating. In an appendix titled “Unplugging from the Consumptive Society”, tip #3 says “When you do decide it is right to purchase an item, see if God will provide it without you having to buy it. Pray about it for a week, then consider if you still need it. If God hasn’t provided it and you do still need the item, go ahead and purchase it.” The Willow Creek speaker shown on the DVD reiterated the point that immediately buying large things you need removes the opportunity for God to use the need as a “learning experience”.

My first reaction was, WTF? This sounds very much like the prosperity gospel idea of “if you pray hard enough God will give you a Mercedes,” which is a movement even less palatable than that of the megachurch, and the general vaguely religious superstition that you can beg stuff from the powers that be (be what? I’ve always wondered about that phrase).

Anyway...it really was a good seminar overall. Aside from the book being rather content-light and short of advice for young adults fresh out of college/school, I didn’t have any complaints. And the lunch was great for five bucks. Some parts were boring, as my income and net worth were zero and negative several hundred respectively, but once I get paid I’ll probably be somewhat better organized about knowing what to do with it (more on that in a later post, probably).

After it ended I went to the house of a friend who’d persuaded me to join her in the seminar. As she was driving me back, we spotted an enormous melange of junk that someone had left by the side of the road – within walking distance of my apartment – including three bookshelves.

Twenty minutes of walking back and forth with a dolly netted me two light but sturdy metal shelves of the angle-iron style (I left the white chipboard one), an acrylic globe chandelier, and a tatty broom for the porch.

Okay, okay, it’s not that I don’t believe in divine providence, it’s just that I’m a little suspicious of my own assumptions about it when it happens too easily...


AOL absolutely sucks in terms of consumer choice. When you use one of their free CDs, the installer doesn’t give you any options and puts a load of crap on your desktop and in your hard drive:\Program Files folder. I deleted and/or uninstalled most of it except the main program and the AOL Dialer program. Am planning to post a sign by the mailboxes asking my neighbours (none of whom I’ve met yet) if any of them would be willing to share a wireless network in return for contributing to payment of their DSL bills. Hopefully the owner of “bin’s home” never figured out we were piggybacking on their network.




After I got rid of most of the AOL junk, I wound up spending a good several hours surfing aimlessly (see Lifehouse’s “Sick Cycle Carousel” for a nice angry song about addiction: “If shame had a face I think it would kinda look like mine / if it had a home would it be my eyes”). Wired had an article about a bunch of SuicideGirls going on strike, so I checked out their website out of curiosity. (Yes, I’m writing about porn in the same entry as about churches.) I’ve never gone to a pornography site deliberately, but that one’s all soft-porn anyway. Looked at some of the sample pictures and saved a couple of models who had really lovely tattoos. One had a triangular area across her upper chest that looked like a sunset with wings.

Looking at beautiful bodies makes me think of the quotation CS Lewis included in “That Hideous Strength” about the beauty of the female being the garden of delight for both males and females or something like that – everybody knows women generally don’t enjoy looking at naked men as much as the converse. Some other models are skinny to the point of ugliness, though – ribsy chests sticking out like an advanced emphysema case.

I’ve been flirting with the idea of getting tattoos, since my friend Amanda who’s one of the least ‘wild’ people I know got one with the logo of her drum corps, but the three reasons not to get one are a) they’re expensive to the point of being a luxury, b) I don’t know how my aesthetic tastes will change in the future, and c) my parents would freak – in DEscending priority order.